Jesus
says in Matthew 5:17: “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the
Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill” It is assumed that because
Jesus didn’t come to “destroy” the old law, it can still be used as a source of
law alongside the law of the New Testament. But this is an incorrect
interpretation of Matthew 5:17.
The key to understanding this verse is
the word “fulfill.” The Greek word is pleroo
and it literally means, “satisfy, complete, finish.” In Matthew 5:17, Jesus is
basically referring to the Law of Moses as a contract, and He came to satisfy and complete the terms of that contract.
Consider this illustration. When you
purchase a car, you are given a contract with terms and conditions. When you
make the last payment 60 months later, you fulfill
the contract; the terms have been completely satisfied and you are now free from
the bond of that contract.
Jesus didn’t come to disregard the terms
or conditions of the Old Testament law. Rather, He came to fulfill it, and He
did (Luke 24:27, 44). Because He fulfilled the contract in every way, we are no
longer bound to it—we can gather valuable principles from it (Rom. 15:4; 1 Cor.
10:11), but it is no longer a valid source of law (Col. 2:14-16).
No comments:
Post a Comment