Friday, July 13, 2012

3 Lessons From Romans 7:10-25

Two days ago, I wrote an article explaining Romans 7:10-25, which is one of the most difficult and controversial passages in one of the most difficult and controversial books of the Bible. Even though there are many interpretations of this text, it is obvious to me that Paul here is explaining just how difficult and frustrating it was for the Jews to follow the Law of Moses, how Jesus had delivered them from the bondage of that burdensome Law, and how absurd it was for the Jews to want to return to it when they had freedom and deliverance in Jesus Christ. (Click here to access my first article on Romans 7:10-25).

Hopefully, my first article was helpful in explaining the basic meaning of Romans 7:10-25. However, when we come to controversial passages such as this, we spend so much time explaining what it doesn't say that we fail to fully comprehend the actual message. Dear reader, Paul didn't write Romans 7:10-25 just to give us something else to argue about; this passage is meant, not only to clarify a misunderstanding that existed in the first century, but to convey wonderful lessons that, when properly understood and grasped, will build up our faith. So in this second article, I'd like to move away from the scholarly analysis and focus simply on three highly encouraging lessons that can be gleaned from this wonderful text.

First of all, as was explained in the previous article, the Law of Moses was the source of so much frustration for the Jews who attempted to obey it perfectly. Despite their best efforts to keep every aspect of the Law, they found themselves failing miserably time and time again. "For what I am doing, I do not understand. For what I will to do, that I do not practice; but what I hate, that I do" (Rom. 7:15). Thankfully, Christ has delivered us from that frustrating system known as the Law of Moses (vs. 24), thus implying that Christians should not be equally frustrated in their obedience to the commandments of Christ. 
"For we are not writing any other things to you than what you read or understand. Now I trust you will understand, even to the end" (2 Cor. 1:13).
"But I fear, lest somehow, as t he serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ" (2 Cor. 11:3).
 "For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments. And His commandments are not burdensome" (1 John 5:3).
If, as you read and study the New Testament you find yourself constantly frustrated, unable to understand what it says, overwhelmed by the commandments found therein, something is wrong. While some of it is hard to understand (2 Pet. 3:16), the Law of Christ is quite simple. While some of the commands of Christ are difficult to apply, they are only difficult to apply because of our pride and refusal to submit, not because the commands themselves are difficult.

Too often, I have seen men (and even brethren) take a simple concept or text and make it complicated. Sermons are preached and Bible classes are taught that overanalyze and/or abuse the scriptures to the point that brethren walk away more confused. This is sad, for by complicating the New Testament like this, we're taking away one of the greatest advantages of Christ's law over the Law of Moses, and Christians end up just as frustrated as the Jews of old. Paul says in Romans 7 that we've been delivered from that.

A second lesson to be gleaned from Romans 7:10-25 is that the Law of Christ is NOT a "law of sin." You see, the Law of Moses was called a "law of sin" (Rom. 7:23) and even a "law of sin and death" (8:2). The law itself wasn't sinful (7:7); in fact, it was "holy" (vs. 12), for God had ordained it. But the Law of Moses ultimately was not meant to deliver the Jews from sin, but rather to weigh them down with sin. In Romans 7, Paul explained how "sin, taking opportunity by the commandment, produced in [the Jews] all manner of evil desire" (vs. 8), and how the Law brought "death." Again, the harder they tried to keep the Law, the more they realized how sinful they were, and how hopeless their situation was. Later, Paul wrote to the Galatians that the law was a "curse" (Gal. 4:14) and it's only purpose was to confine all under sin (Gal. 3:22) until Christ could come. And Christ has delivered us from this "law of sin."
"Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body, that you should obey it in its lusts...For sin shall not have dominion over you, for you are not under law but under grace" (Rom. 6:12, 14).
"But in those sacrifices there is a reminder of sins every year. For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins...But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God..." (Heb. 10:3-4, 12).
Sin does exist today. Christians can sin. We do sin from time to time, in fact (1 Jn. 1:8, 10). And yet we have an escape from sin that the Jews didn't have in the Old Testament. While the Law of Moses made it impossible to get out from under your sins, and constantly reminded you how hopeless and helpless you were, the Law of Christ (i.e. the New Testament) has made it possible for us to lay aside the weight of sin  and to "run with endurance the race that is set before us" (Heb. 12:1). Rather than live with the constant burden that I am stuck in sin, and no matter how hard I try, I cannot escape it, I need to live with the joy and knowledge that, because of Christ, I am free! I can walk in the light as He is in the light and have true fellowship with God, with Christ, and with other saints (1 John 1). How amazing is this?

The third lesson that we ought to learn from Romans 7:10-25 is that "with the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin" (vs. 25). The law of sin is a reference to the Law of Moses. The Jewish-Christians of the first century who were holding onto the Law of Moses were doing so to satisfy the flesh. Galatians 6:13 says, "For not even those who are circumcised keep the law, but they desire to have you circumcised that they may boast in your flesh." In other words, their desire wasn't to be conformed to the will of God, but to do what they wanted to do. Even during the Old Testament when the Law was in effect, the emphasis was placed upon outward actions that eventually (hopefully) would result in the right mind. So it often became about "going through the motions."

However, the New Testament law is a law that begins in the mind and is motivated by the mind. So many of the laws we have pertain to our attitude (Gal. 5:22-23; Eph. 4:25-32; the sermon on the mount in Matthew 5-7). Even those commands that demand outward action are ALWAYS accompanied by inward thought and desire. The Lord's Supper involves an examination of self (1 Cor. 11:28). Singing is to be from the heart (Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:16). Giving is to be as we've purposed in our hearts (2 Cor. 9:6-7). And so many other illustrations could be given.

Again, it is regrettable that many Christians treat the Law of Christ as if it's the Law of Moses. They are completely unfulfilled and unsatisfied (spiritually frustrated) because they're just going through the motions with the expectation that their love for God will eventually grow. Instead of forcing ourselves into a ritualistic pattern of behavior, we need to first of all be "transformed by the renewing of [our] mind" (Rom. 12:2). 

As difficult as it may be to understand some of the ins and outs of Romans 7:10-25, hopefully we can agree on these three points. In the end, we need to treat the Law of Christ, not like the Law of Moses, but like the "perfect law of liberty" it is said to be. If you find yourself unendingly frustrated, burdened, and confused, and if you're stuck in the rut of ritualism, please know that you're not following Christ as He intends for you to, and you're missing out on the true joy of what it means to be a Christian.

4 comments:

  1. Hey Casey,

    Before I start, I'm not responding to be argumentative. In fact, part of me wonders if it would be better for us to pick up a phone and talk about this or talk about it at homeschool campout. It seems that internet discussions and e-mail discussion so quickly devolve into fusses, fights, and misunderstandings. I am responding because I have been studying this passage a great deal myself and I thought maybe talking these things through with you might be helpful for me. Your lessons here cause me some questions about the law of Moses and the law of Christ. I'd like to share them.

    First, you accurately point out that the law of Moses and that of Christ is different and that we shouldn't turn the law of Christ into another system that is like the law of Moses. I agree with that whole-heartedly. I guess my question then is how are the two laws different?

    After all, the law that Paul used as an example "You shall not covet" is essentially repeated in the New? Wouldn't the mere statement of that law in both covenants produce the same result in us? Learning that we are not to covet from either law would awaken the covetousness, wouldn't it? Is New Law statement against covetousness somehow different such that with the new wording it doesn't give sin any room in our lives? If so, how?

    Second, wasn't the Old Law supposed to start in the mind also? Doesn't Leviticus 26:41 demonstrate that the observance of the Old Law was supposed to proceed from the heart as well? Jesus said that Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18 encompass all the Law and the Prophets, which was to love God and your neighbor. Doesn't that begin in the mind or in the heart? What then is the real difference in your opinion other than some of the codes are different?

    Third, aren't all the laws from the New Covenant that cause people real frustration in their personal lives laws that can be found in the Old? I don't know many people that are frustrated because they are trying really hard to take the Lord's Supper only on Sunday and every Sunday but they just keep messing up on that. I also don't know many that are trying really hard to sing without instruments, but they just keep stumbling there. But I know plenty that are frustrated with keeping the law of God when it comes to lying, lusting, sexual sins, etc. These are the same things condemned in both laws. So how are the laws different?

    ReplyDelete
  2. A couple of thoughts...

    First of all, Peter himself rebuked the Judaizing teachers for "putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear" (Ac. 15:10). I think this is partly what Paul had in mind when he wrote, "Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage" (Gal. 5:1). Yes, there are laws in the NT just as there were in the OT, but the Law of Moses, but what I gather from these statements is that the Law of Moses was inifinitely MORE complex and burdensome.

    And yes, while it's absolutely possible for Christians today to be spiritually frustrated and to struggle with certain commands, we are constantly reminded throughout the NT that we can find peace, comfort and hope in Christ, and that we can grow to maturity...to the point that "perfect love casts out fear." That's pretty amazing!

    Third, the OT did emphasize obedience from the heart; even Jesus acknowledged that, regarding the old law, the two greatest commands were to love God and to love one's neighbor (Mt. 22:37-38). If we learn anything from the prophets, it's that God wasn't pleased when His people were just going through the motions. So I'm not saying that the Law of Moses didn't require inward zeal. However, when you compare the two laws, it's easy to see that one has more of a physical/outward focus while the other places MORE emphasis on attitude and heart. While the Jews of old were raised up following the Law and going through the motions (and hopefully would develop a passion for God), we today begin our embrace of the new covenant with a zeal and passion for God (it's a choice) that then leads us down a path of faithful obedience.

    Finally, as I pointed out in the article, the Law of Moses, as difficult and as tedious as it was, couldn't lead one out of their sins. No matter how hard they tried, they couldn't overcome that chasm. Christ changed that, and I have to believe that there is some mental/spiritual "release" when the burden of our sins is actually removed from us (something the Jews didn't have).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Casey,

    I think I agree with everything you said in your reply.

    So that leads to my big question. Is it possible for us to treat the New Covenant law the same way the Jews did the Old Covenant law? If we do, are we not also trying to be justified by law in the exact same way they were, but with a different set of legal codes?

    Please do not misunderstand me. I believe God has a pattern for how His church is to worship and work. I believe He has a law for us that when we violate it we sin. That is the whole reason we need the grace that comes through Jesus Christ. But in my past, I feel like I've made the New Covenant more about the externals--5 acts of worship, 3 works of the church, etc. Perhaps it is simpler than the OT, but is facing it that way doing the exact same thing the Jews did? Is it trying to establish our own righteousness and approaching Christ's law through works and not through faith (cf. Romans 9:30-10:4)?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Edwin, to answer your big question, "YES!" I don't think that the concept of "five acts of worship, three works of church, etc" are necessarily indicitive of some troublesome "works-based-salvation" mindset, but yes, the mindset can exist. In other words, if we focus merely on the externals, the motions, without delving into the wisdom behind these acts, the spiritual side of things, Christian attitude (i.e. the fruit of the Spirit), then, yes, we are guilty. And Edwin, I didn't grow up in the church, but I will say that I have seen this mindset among some brethren, and yes, it ought to be corrected. That's why, in my preaching, I try to put a lot of emphasis on the more spiritual side of things, rather than just lessons on what we need to DO. Instead of an out-in approach, we need to be stressing an in-out approach, which is, I believe, what the NT scriptures advocate.

    ReplyDelete